| 摘要: |
| 由于我国当前有关司法权介入体育内部纠纷的界限在立法、司法中存在模糊化认识问题，导致体育内部纠纷当事人在寻求司法救济时存在障碍，有必要从理论层面对其进行解释。作为体育自治权之来源的契约论在解释司法权介入体育内部纠纷之界限的问题上存在瑕疵，日本的“部分社会”理论对于我国论证司法权与体育自治之间的关系具有参考意义。通过对日本相关案例的分析，得出司法对体育内部纠纷的二阶段审查模式，重点在于审查体育内部纠纷是否对当事人之一般市民法权利造成重大影响。基于契约论与“部分社会”理论的要求，构建出适合我国司法现状的用以判断司法权是否需要介入体育内部纠纷解决的理论框架，司法机关首先应判断体育内部纠纷是否具备法律上的意义，其次对团体自治行为是否超出了成员“默示同意”的范畴进行审查。 |
| 关键词: 体育内部纠纷 司法权的界限 契约论 “部分社会”理论 体育自治 |
| DOI： |
| 投稿时间：2023-03-06 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Research on the Boundary of Judicial Power Intervening in Sports Internal Disputes ——Centered on Partial Society Theory |
| WANG Liyuan |
| (Central University of Finance and Economics, School of Law，Beijing 100081 , China) |
| Abstract: |
| Due to the vague understanding of the boundary of judicial power involved in sports internal disputes in legislation and judicature in China，there are obstacles for the parties involved in sports internal disputes to seek judicial relief, so it is necessary to explain it from the theoretical level. As the source of sports autonomy, contract theory has defects in explaining the boundary of judicial power intervening in sports internal disputes. Japan’s “partial society” theory has reference significance for China to demonstrate the relationship between judicial power and sports autonomy. Through the analysis of relevant cases in Japan, the second trial mode of judicial review of internal disputes in sports is obtained, focusing on whether the internal disputes in sports have a significant impact on the general civil law rights of the parties. Based on the requirements of contract theory and “partial society” theory, this paper constructs a theoretical framework suitable for China’s judicial status to judge whether judicial power needs to intervene in the settlement of sports internal disputes. The judicial organs should first judge whether the sports internal disputes have legal significance, and then examine whether the group autonomy behavior exceeds the scope of members “implied consent”. |
| Key words: sports internal disputes boundary of judicial power contract theory “partial society” theory sports autonomy |
