| 摘要: |
| 刑事制裁涉兴奋剂犯罪第一案判决的作出,标志着《关于审理走私、非法经营、非法使用兴奋剂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》已成为兴奋剂犯罪案件的审理依据。但兴奋剂犯罪拟制规定在补强反兴奋剂规则治理效果、衔接反兴奋剂规则处罚规定的同时,也存在致使兴奋剂犯罪处理结果失当的风险。如何规范适用该解释中的兴奋剂犯罪拟制规定,成为后续审理兴奋剂犯罪案件的关注重点。为避免兴奋剂犯罪行为处置陷入规范冲突,在适用兴奋剂犯罪拟制规定时,应遵循兴奋剂违规处理程序的前置适用,并保持与我国《刑法》第13条“但书”规定的体系协调。 |
| 关键词: 兴奋剂犯罪 司法解释 拟制规定 体系适用 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金西部项目“刑罚退出机制的价值确立与实践运行研究”(17XFX009)；河北省社会科学基金项目“人工智能犯罪刑事司法问题研究”(HB20FX012) |
|
| Judicial Application of Fictitious Provisions on Doping Crime |
| HUO Junge |
| (School of Artificial Intelligence and Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120 , China) |
| Abstract: |
| The judgment of the first case of criminal sanctions on doping crime signifies that the Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Criminal Cases of Smuggling, Illegal Business, and Illegal Use of Doping has become the basis for the trial of doping crime. However, while reinforcing the governance effect of anti-doping regulations and linking up the punishment provisions of anti-doping regulations, there is also a risk of improper treatment results of doping crime. And how to regulate and apply the provisions of the interpretation on doping crime will become the focus of follow-up trials of doping crime. In order to avoid the conflict of norms in the disposal of doping crime, the pre-application of the procedures for dealing with doping violations should be followed in the application of the provisions for doping crimes, and the system should be coordinated with the provisions of Article 13“proviso”of the Criminal Law of China. |
| Key words: doping crime judicial interpretation fictitious provisions systematic application |
